COMMIT GINZA / AI Mystery Manga: Live-Action Version / EPISODE 38

"I returned the watch and left at 11:59 PM." However, the evidence photo showed the time window reading "10." Was it the watch that skipped an hour, or the owner's account that was off? Kenji and the Appraiser pursue the mystery of a watch that vanished during a late-night exhibition and a final hour that seems strangely long.

MIDNIGHT WATCH PREVIEW / Around 12:15 AM
A photo from 11:59 PM.
And yet, "eleven" is nowhere to be seen.
Supposedly evidence of its return, yet somehow, one hour is missing.
Katagiri: "This is the photo I took at 11:59 PM. I returned the watch to the case and left the building at 12:05 AM."
Kenji
The minutes say fifty-nine. It matches right down to the details. Well, I guess he's innocent...
Appraiser
Hold it. Before you look at the details, you're missing an entire hour.
A live-action-style scene at a late-night exhibition where the Appraiser examines a return photo and Kenji points to an empty display case
The time window in the return photo was the first inconsistency.
CASE FILE 38 | The Missing Watch and the Hour-Long Overtime Report
  • Setting: A late-night preview event for a fictional brand held at a hotel in Ginza
  • Missing Item: A jumping-hour display model / Management No. JH-38
  • Discovery: Around 12:08 AM, an empty pedestal was discovered during post-event inventory
  • Statement: Operations staff Katagiri claims, "Returned at 11:59 PM, left at 12:05 AM"
  • Caution: The time window is a 12-hour display. A single photo cannot confirm the actual time it was taken

① A little earlier, "12" suddenly appeared during the midnight demonstration

Shortly before 12:00 AM, Kenji and the Appraiser were at the central demonstration table. Toyama placed a silver wristwatch with a small window at the 12 o'clock position on the tray. The window showed "11." The blue center hand was advancing along the minute scale on the outer rim. It was a demo model of the same type, different from the stolen JH-38 unit.

As the hand reached the 12 o'clock position, the digit in the window snapped to "12." Kenji leaned in. He looked like he was waiting for "13" to appear next, but naturally, the watch didn't wait for him.

Kenji
Do that one more time! Next, won't three sevens line up?
Appraiser
Don't treat the watch like a slot machine. There's only one window, and even if you hit it, you only gain an hour.
Kenji
Then, when closing time goes from twelve back to one, doesn't our working time rewind too?
Appraiser
Want me to add an extra hour of overtime just for you?
A live-action-style scene during the midnight demonstration where the Appraiser holds a demo watch showing 12 and Kenji raises his hand for a replay
The watch used for the midnight demonstration was a same-model sample, not the stolen item.

② You can read the time perfectly even without an hour hand

What is a Jumping Hour?

A "jumping hour" is a display mechanism that indicates the "hour" with a numeral and snaps instantly to the next numeral at the turn of the hour. The fictional model in this story shows hours 1 through 12 in the window at the 12 o'clock position, with a single center hand indicating the minutes. While running normally, the digit remains fixed in the window for that hour and switches on the hour.

The window is not for the date. Also, the movement before and after the jump and the adjustment methods vary by model. A "watch with jumping digits" does not necessarily mean every model behaves the same way.

12:08 AM. The cleaning crew found an empty pedestal in a different section. Toyama opened the lending ledger and contacted Katagiri. The photo he sent, having already left the venue, was labeled "11:59 PM return photo." The pair, having finished their demonstration, also examined the photo.

Kenji
I see, this ten is an hour, not a date. I thought for ten days it had been stuck at the same time.
Appraiser
If it stayed the same for ten days, we'd be discussing repairs instead of mysteries.
A live-action-style scene where Kenji and the Appraiser examine an enlargement of the photo showing the watch at 10 o'clock and 59 minutes
The photo showed a display corresponding to the "end of the 10 o'clock hour."

③ Katagiri was the last person to borrow the watch

The JH-38 managed by Toyama had been in its display case until around 10:50 PM. Katagiri requested to borrow it, saying he wanted to "take close-up shots for the closing report," and followed formal procedures. When handing it over on a white tray, Toyama confirmed the management number on the case back and recorded the borrower and purpose in the ledger.

It was to be returned to the display case in the back. Katagiri had an operations pass that could open and close the cases. However, it was a rule that all staff participate in the post-event inspection. Simply sending a photo does not constitute a completed return.

Toyama: "I told him to bring it back by 11:30 PM. I had an agreement with him to notify me if the photography ran long."
Kenji
So there's a return photo, but no returned watch. It's like getting a delivery photo of food that never arrives.
Appraiser
Exactly. A photo won't fill your stomach. And an empty pedestal is just the same.

Toyama replied that she had not stopped the watch or changed the time when it was lent out. However, she did not know if it had been tampered with after it was checked out. The Appraiser wrote that discrepancy on another line of his notes.

A live-action-style scene where Toyama formally lends the display watch to Katagiri on a white tray while Kenji looks on
There is a record of it being lent out. The physical confirmation of its return has yet to be done.

④ Around 12:30 AM, lining up the three accounts

Katagiri, asked by the hotel to explain the situation, returned around 12:30 AM. He carried a thin, black document bag over his shoulder. Kuroda, the head of security, attended as Toyama and Katagiri gave their accounts. For some reason, Kenji was busy writing down his own expected clock-out time on a piece of paper.

Misaki Toyama (30) Product Specialist. In charge of lending and post-event inspection. Prepared the demo model for the midnight demonstration.
Osamu Kuroda (50) Head of Security. Can check entry/exit logs and raw camera footage. Not responsible for the watch return procedure.
Keisuke Katagiri (45) Operations Report manager. The person who borrowed JH-38. Claims he "returned it at 11:59 PM and left at 12:05 AM."
Katagiri: "I was here until the very end. I took the photos, put it back in the case, and locked it. I even made it in time for the 12:00 AM closing."
Kenji
I was here until the end too. Though I only participated in the cleanup in my heart.
Appraiser
Only the chair in your heart was cleared away; the chairs in the venue remained.

Toyama was at the midnight demo table. Kuroda was in the security area by the staff entrance. Both of their actions could be verified on the footage from that time. Katagiri, on the other hand, just kept repeating his own claim that he "was there until the end" and pointing to the photo.

A live-action-style scene where Toyama, security head Kuroda, and Katagiri (carrying a black bag) explain the situation to Kenji and the Appraiser
Testimony is just testimony. Don't reach a conclusion until you've checked it against the records.

⑤ If it was "11:59 PM," the window should say 11

The Appraiser used the midnight demo record and the sample watch to confirm how to read the display. Katagiri's photo showed "10" in the window and the minute hand near the fifty-nine-minute mark. According to normal operation of this watch, that combination corresponds to 10:59 PM.

10:59 PM10Hour Window "10"
Minute Hand "59"
11:59 PM11Hour Window "11"
Minute Hand "59"
12:00 AM12Hour Window "12"
Minute Hand "0"

These three are examples of the display when the watch is set to the correct time and running normally. Because it's a 12-hour display, the window would show "10" at 10:59 AM as well. The number in the photo alone cannot tell you if it's day or night, or what day it is.

Kenji
So it shows the same face for AM and PM? It's like they're twins.
Appraiser
Even if the face is the same, breakfast and a midnight snack are different things. It’s no excuse to double your number of meals.
Kenji
I haven't even said anything yet. Your deduction speed is faster than mine.
A live-action-style close-up where the Appraiser points to the time window and central minute hand of the demo watch while Kenji peers in
You read the "hour in the window" and the "minutes with the hand." Either one alone is not enough.

⑥ Calling him the culprit just because of the "10" is still too early

Katagiri: "The window's switch must have been delayed. It was 11:59 PM, but it just stayed on 10."

Kenji started to rise from his chair. The Appraiser gently pushed his shoulder back down. A malfunction, a delay, time adjustments, image tampering—you can't rule these out with just one photo. Some actual models require caution regarding the first switch after manual adjustment.

Kenji
But since the window says 10, didn't he take it an hour earlier? My great deduction is warming up now.
Appraiser
You're warming it up so much it's about to burn. I see the display disagrees with his statement. But to determine the time of the photo, we need other records.
What we know / What we don't know yet
  • Known: The photo's display differs from this model's normal 11:59 PM combination
  • Unknown: Date of photo, AM/PM, whether the watch was set to the correct time, whether the image was tampered with
  • To check next: Actual departure time, actions in the display area, presence of the returned physical item

The Appraiser asked Kuroda to let him see the original footage from the 10 o'clock hour, not just before midnight. The window in the photo didn't tell him the answer; it just broadened the range he needed to search by an hour.

A live-action-style scene where the Appraiser stops Kenji from examining the photo with a magnifying glass to urge him not to jump to conclusions
The watch's display is a clue. It is not a certificate of the time it was taken.

⑦ The exit server didn't know about "12:05 AM"

What Kuroda checked was not the attendance report submitted by Katagiri, but the records remaining on the entry/exit server at the staff entrance. The departure process using Katagiri's pass took place around 11:05 PM. That's an hour earlier than he claimed.

Of course, the pass record alone doesn't prove he personally left. Kuroda opened the raw camera footage from the same time, verified Katagiri personally leaving through the entrance with a black bag after scanning his pass. Without relying on the watch display, his actions were linked through a different system of records.

Katagiri: "Isn't it possible the server or camera is off by an hour?"

Kuroda showed the results of checking the discrepancy between the recording system time and the venue's standard time. He also cross-referenced entries by other staff in the 11 o'clock hour and footage from before and after the midnight demonstration. Katagiri's account wasn't the only one off by an hour. He was checking the original footage, which was continuous, not short edited clips. There was also no record of Katagiri returning after leaving the staff entrance before the midnight closing. Kuroda stopped the screen after confirming the point where Katagiri was called back and returned.

Kenji
On his work report, he was here for an hour. On camera, he wasn't here for an hour. Is this a new form of work style?
Appraiser
It's not telecommuting, and it's not being at the venue. It's just "in-report-only."
A live-action-style scene in the security room where Kuroda, the Appraiser, and Kenji check continuous footage of Katagiri heading to the staff entrance with a black bag
They cross-referenced not just the pass, but the footage of Katagiri himself.

⑧ Locking the door is different from returning the watch

There was no matching record of the display case being unlocked at "11:59 PM." The case was opened and closed with Katagiri's authorization about an hour earlier. Continuous footage of the display area showed Katagiri opening the case, holding the watch in front of the pedestal, and holding up a smartphone.

The position of the pedestal in the background of the photo and the reflection of the lighting behind him also corresponded to that moment of photography. They hadn't checked the photo to prove a delayed switch; they checked it to cross-reference his actual actions seen on camera with the sequence of his statement.

However, there were moments when Katagiri's body hid his hands, and the moment he put the watch into his bag was not captured. The Appraiser didn't explicitly claim he "stole it at 10:59 PM." There had been no other unlocking of the case between that locking and the 12:08 AM inspection, nor any signs that a return procedure had been re-attempted. What was certain was that his claim of having stayed until midnight did not match the records. And that the locking record could not substitute for a physical confirmation of the return.

Time Fact confirmed from records
~10:50 PM Toyama formally lends JH-38 to Katagiri. Management number recorded in ledger
10:58–11:00 PM Case opened/closed with Katagiri's authorization. Continuous footage shows him photographing the watch before the pedestal
~11:05 PM Departure record under Katagiri's name. Footage from same time shows him leaving staff entrance with a bag
11:59–12:00 AM Kenji and Appraiser confirm midnight time switch with a different sample
~12:08 AM Post-event inspection reveals JH-38 pedestal is empty
~12:30 AM Katagiri, having been called back, returns to venue. Situation confirmed with security witness
Kenji
"I locked it" might be true, but "I returned it" is another thing. Even if I lock the front door, it doesn't mean I'm inside.
Appraiser
Right. Though if you're inside, I can usually tell just by looking at the snacks in the fridge.
A live-action-style scene where the Appraiser, Toyama, and Kenji cross-reference the display case lending ledger, locking history, and entry/exit server records
Lending records, lock records, departure records. They each show different things.

⑨ The one-hour lie is clear. But where is the watch?

The Appraiser looked at the black bag on the edge of the desk. When he borrowed it, when he left, and now that he had returned—Katagiri had the same-looking bag. However, his actions outside the venue were not captured by the venue cameras. Footage alone couldn't prove the watch had been inside it the whole time.

Appraiser
I'll verify the early departure and the removal of the watch separately. The watch isn't in the return area, and you were the one who borrowed it, Katagiri. With Kuroda as a witness, would you mind letting us check the bag?
Katagiri: "…I'll open it myself."
Kenji
Tonight's bag isn't talking, is it? Last time, we had a bag that talked quite a lot.
Appraiser
Don't expect every watch to introduce itself. This time, we'll verify it from our end.

Kuroda readied his recording camera. Until Katagiri himself opened the zipper, the two didn't reach for the bag. What came out of the inner pocket wasn't documents. It was a soft black pouch, and inside it, the silver watch.

A live-action-style scene where Katagiri opens his black document bag under the witness of Kuroda, while the Appraiser in white gloves waits for physical confirmation
The location of the watch was confirmed by having him open the bag and checking the physical item under witness.

⑩ The JH-38 on the case back answered the rest of the return photo mystery

The Appraiser took the watch with his white-gloved hands and turned the case back toward the recording camera. Management number "JH-38." It was the same number, same appearance, and same unique small scratches as the original close-up shot taken before it was lent out. It wasn't a same-model substitute that was found, but the vanished display watch itself.

The "10" in the window wasn't the only deciding factor

Presented with the lending records, the footage of him leaving, the empty pedestal, the physical item recovered under witness, and the matching management number, Katagiri admitted that he had taken the watch without returning it and had reported his departure time an hour late.

Katagiri: "I thought if I claimed the photo I took in the 10 o'clock hour was taken in the 11 o'clock hour, it would explain why I was here until the end. As for the watch… I intended to take it home with me."
Kenji
You skipped the time numbers to suit your own needs, but you couldn't make the watch's numbers skip.
Appraiser
If you wanted to leave early, you should have just asked properly. The issue is removing the watch without permission and falsifying the explanations for its return and your work attendance.

The hotel secured the watch and records, turning them over to the operations manager. They didn't just end it with Katagiri's confession; they preserved the physical evidence results and each record where his statement had contradicted the facts. It was a much more painstaking follow-up process than the watch's digits jumping.

A live-action-style scene where the Appraiser holds the watch case back with white gloves for comparison against the pre-lending record while Katagiri hangs his head
Just saying it's the same model isn't enough. We cross-referenced the management number and features against the original records.
Mismatch of window and statement
Trigger for investigation
Exit server + original footage
Verified actual departure
Lending record + empty pedestal
Verified return statement
Physical item + management number
Confirmed the unit removed

After the incident, Kenji tries to make his own clock-out "jump"

Back to help clean up, Kenji advanced his own watch by an hour and flashed it from his sleeve. Next to the watch was the midnight snack plate he had finally secured. His expression was more dignified than Katagiri's just a moment ago.

Kenji
Look at that. It's already 1 AM. My clock-out time just made a beautiful jump.
Appraiser
The time might have advanced, but the cleaning hasn't.
Kenji
Then, how about the manual work, jumping-style? Don't you have one of those things where it's finished before you know it?
Appraiser
I do. Stand up now and move these chairs.
Kenji
That's totally manual. Where did the high-end stuff go?
Appraiser
Even high-end watches don't have a built-in mechanism for cleaning up.
A comical, live-action-style scene where the Appraiser catches Kenji trying to leave early by showing his advanced watch, while a plate of snacks sits on the table
Even if you can make the time display jump, you can't make the work itself jump.

Conclusion: When the numbers jump, don't let your deduction jump too

Appraiser
What the "10" in the window taught us this time is, "Check that '11:59 PM' statement one more time." Is the watch set correctly? Is there a delay in the mechanism? Is the photo authentic? You can't determine the time it was taken or identify a culprit without verifying those things.

The fact that he left an hour early was confirmed by the exit server and continuous footage of him. The removal of the watch was confirmed by piling up the lending records, the empty pedestal, the physical item recovered from his bag, the management number, and his own admitted account.

Numbers jump in an instant. But you must never skip the order in which you verify the evidence.
※The characters, exhibitions, theft incidents, and watches in this work are fictional. The images are photorealistic renderings generated by AI. "JH-38" is a fictional inventory number for the displayed object and is not a model number of any real brand. The watch in this work is designed with an hour window numbered one through twelve and a single central minute hand. The actual display configuration, behavior before and after switching, and any switching or lag after adjustment vary by model. Please follow the manufacturer's instruction manual for operation. A twelve-hour display or a single photograph cannot prove AM/PM status, the date of the photograph, correct time settings, or that the image is unedited. The times shown in this work are verified by the minute and do not establish events down to the second based on the watch display.
References for mechanism explanation (Manufacturer official)

監修者のプロフィール

コミット銀座のロゴ

コミット銀座

2015年の会社設立以来、"高く買い、安く売る"をモットーに、顧客第一主義を徹底。価格面におけるメリットのみならず、お客様が安心して買い物出来る環境づくり、お客様に最適な時計の提案も実現。
徐々にお客様からの信頼も得て、多くの顧客様を抱えることに成功。高い知識を要するヴィンテージロレックスや、パテックフィリップを始めとするハイエンド商材の取り扱いを得意とする、新進気鋭の高級腕時計専門店。

時事ニュース